Will Congress leave poor Maine kids hungry?

Will Congress leave poor Maine kids hungry?

Just when you thought Congress has finally gotten something right, they disappoint once again.

I am talking about the national school meal programs. Congress assumed correctly that if more than 40% of students in a school automatically qualified for free or reduced lunch, there were likely a lot more hungry kids besides those enrolled in the program. And in 2014, under the community eligibility provision of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, nutritious meals became available to all children in those high-poverty schools. This not only fed more hungry children, it eliminated the stigma that only poor kids get free meals.

But now Congress is considering a bill that would severely restrict schools’ participation in community eligibility and eliminate free meals for as many as 10,000 Maine kids.

U.S. Representative Todd Rokita, chair of the House Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education introduced HR 5003 last week. It increases from 40% to 60% the percentage of vulnerable students needed for a school or school district to qualify for community eligibility.

In Maine, 155 schools exceed the 40% test. Only 13 meet the 60% threshold.[1]

We all know that hungry children do not perform well in school. They are more likely to misbehave, miss more school, and do poorly on tests. Community eligibility increases the number of low-income students participating in meal programs and improves student achievement, diets, and behavior.

The community eligibility option is smart policy. This bill is irresponsible and cruel, punishing not just children, but Maine’s most vulnerable kids: those who don’t have enough to eat.

[1] See List of schools and eligibility on the Maine Department of Education web site.

Photo via Flickr/another sergio.

About author

Jody Harris
Jody Harris 6 posts

Jody is associate director of the Maine Center for Economic policy and has 30 years of public policy and management experience. She worked at the Maine State Planning Office under four governors and served as town manager in two Maine towns. She has a master’s degree in public administration from the University of Maine.

Comments

You might also like

Wall Street

Sen. King poised to support Wall Street deregulation

Last month the New York Times ran an editorial with the headline “Deregulating Corporate America” that sounded the alarm on a package of bills being introduced by a group of

democracy

Schmidt: What Judy Garland can teach us about politics in 2017

I love writing this column. I love figuring it out in my head, in the shower or on my commute; I love being forced to articulate my responses to political

federal

U.S. Senate bill could block Maine’s toxic chemical protections

Congress passed the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) forty years ago to prevent harm to pregnant women, babies, workers, and other vulnerable groups from dangerous chemicals in everyday products. But